<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1367 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783827</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was confirmed after the petitioner joined the investigation and the State ed that custodial interrogation was no longer required. Once the investigative purpose no longer justified arrest protection, the interim relief continued as confirmed bail. The Court also required compliance with the existing condition to surrender the passport or file an affidavit of non-possession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1367 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783827</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was confirmed after the petitioner joined the investigation and the State ed that custodial interrogation was no longer required. Once the investigative purpose no longer justified arrest protection, the interim relief continued as confirmed bail. The Court also required compliance with the existing condition to surrender the passport or file an affidavit of non-possession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>