https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783829 A writ petition challenging a GST demand and alleged excessive security under section 129(1)(b) was not entertained where the dispute turned on facts about intra-State purchase and transport of goods, and the petitioner had not replied to the show-cause notice. The High Court declined interference under Article 226 in view of the factual controversy and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal, subject to limitation. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783829 A writ petition challenging a GST demand and alleged excessive security under section 129(1)(b) was not entertained where the dispute turned on facts about intra-State purchase and transport of goods, and the petitioner had not replied to the show-cause notice. The High Court declined interference under Article 226 in view of the factual controversy and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal, subject to limitation. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783829