https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783833 The dominant issue was whether a writ petition was maintainable despite an efficacious statutory appellate remedy, on the plea that the impugned order was non-speaking, failed to satisfy Rule 138 under the CGST framework, and violated natural justice. The HC held that the authority had considered the defence in detail, recorded a finding of misrepresentation and fraud, and passed a comprehensive order reflecting sufficient compliance with audi alteram partem; the cited precedent was held inapplicable on these facts. Consequently, the HC declined to bypass the alternate remedy and dismissed the petition. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783833 The dominant issue was whether a writ petition was maintainable despite an efficacious statutory appellate remedy, on the plea that the impugned order was non-speaking, failed to satisfy Rule 138 under the CGST framework, and violated natural justice. The HC held that the authority had considered the defence in detail, recorded a finding of misrepresentation and fraud, and passed a comprehensive order reflecting sufficient compliance with audi alteram partem; the cited precedent was held inapplicable on these facts. Consequently, the HC declined to bypass the alternate remedy and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws GST Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783833