https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465420 An application seeking recall/clarification of a final SC order was held impermissible where, in substance, it sought review while bypassing the prescribed review procedure. Relying on prior SC authority, the Court reiterated that parties cannot circumvent circulation and obtain an open-court rehearing through "recall" or "modification" applications; such filings warrant dismissal with costs. A further recall application against an order dismissing an earlier recall was held not maintainable, the only remedy being a review petition as earlier indicated by the Court. The impugned recall application was therefore treated as an abuse of process, justifying refusal to entertain it and warning that repetitive non-maintainable filings may invite directions restraining further registry acceptance. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2025 19:39:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465420 An application seeking recall/clarification of a final SC order was held impermissible where, in substance, it sought review while bypassing the prescribed review procedure. Relying on prior SC authority, the Court reiterated that parties cannot circumvent circulation and obtain an open-court rehearing through "recall" or "modification" applications; such filings warrant dismissal with costs. A further recall application against an order dismissing an earlier recall was held not maintainable, the only remedy being a review petition as earlier indicated by the Court. The impugned recall application was therefore treated as an abuse of process, justifying refusal to entertain it and warning that repetitive non-maintainable filings may invite directions restraining further registry acceptance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465420