<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 91 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48848</link>
    <description>The rectification of mistake application was allowed, leading to the recall of the final order for fresh consideration. The appeal of the Collector of Central Excise was rejected, confirming that recovery of erroneously refunded amounts must be pursued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, in accordance with legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 91 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48848</link>
      <description>The rectification of mistake application was allowed, leading to the recall of the final order for fresh consideration. The appeal of the Collector of Central Excise was rejected, confirming that recovery of erroneously refunded amounts must be pursued under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, in accordance with legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>