https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783758 Recovery proceedings under s.73 of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that the adjudication order was passed without granting any opportunity of hearing and without application of mind. Applying the coordinate Bench ruling that a non-speaking order lacking due consideration fails the Article 14 test and violates principles of natural justice, the HC held that such an order cannot be sustained. Consequently, the impugned recovery order and the consequential order were quashed and set aside, and the writ petition was allowed. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:38:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783758 Recovery proceedings under s.73 of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that the adjudication order was passed without granting any opportunity of hearing and without application of mind. Applying the coordinate Bench ruling that a non-speaking order lacking due consideration fails the Article 14 test and violates principles of natural justice, the HC held that such an order cannot be sustained. Consequently, the impugned recovery order and the consequential order were quashed and set aside, and the writ petition was allowed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783758