<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST summons over alleged s.132 tax evasion by client firms: chartered accountant&#039;s limited role leads to anticipatory bail</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95288</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was sought apprehending arrest for alleged offences under s.132 of the Central/Gujarat GST Acts pursuant to summons under s.70. The court held that the core allegation of tax evasion pertained to the applicant&#039;s client firms, whereas the applicant, being only a chartered accountant maintaining/auditing accounts, was not engaged in supply/manufacture/trade and could not be treated as the person liable to pay GST for any alleged evasion by those firms; statutory recovery mechanisms apply against the liable taxable persons. Applying the liberal and fact-specific discretion under s.438 CrPC, anticipatory bail was granted subject to bond/surety and conditions. - DSC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:38:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:38:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST summons over alleged s.132 tax evasion by client firms: chartered accountant&#039;s limited role leads to anticipatory bail</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95288</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was sought apprehending arrest for alleged offences under s.132 of the Central/Gujarat GST Acts pursuant to summons under s.70. The court held that the core allegation of tax evasion pertained to the applicant&#039;s client firms, whereas the applicant, being only a chartered accountant maintaining/auditing accounts, was not engaged in supply/manufacture/trade and could not be treated as the person liable to pay GST for any alleged evasion by those firms; statutory recovery mechanisms apply against the liable taxable persons. Applying the liberal and fact-specific discretion under s.438 CrPC, anticipatory bail was granted subject to bond/surety and conditions. - DSC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:38:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>