https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465417 Reliable eyewitness testimony, when materially corroborated by site circumstances and recoveries, can sustain a murder conviction notwithstanding a defence challenge based on firing distance or weapon identification; the medical evidence was treated as consistent with a shot from a higher position, and the conviction of Mohan Singh was upheld. Liability under Section 34 IPC requires proof of a shared common intention to kill beyond reasonable doubt; where Kailash Singh was shown only to have made a general exhortation without firearm use or active participation, joint liability was not established and his conviction was set aside. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465417 Reliable eyewitness testimony, when materially corroborated by site circumstances and recoveries, can sustain a murder conviction notwithstanding a defence challenge based on firing distance or weapon identification; the medical evidence was treated as consistent with a shot from a higher position, and the conviction of Mohan Singh was upheld. Liability under Section 34 IPC requires proof of a shared common intention to kill beyond reasonable doubt; where Kailash Singh was shown only to have made a general exhortation without firearm use or active participation, joint liability was not established and his conviction was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465417