<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Passive infrastructure demerger transfer treated as gift; depreciation, TDS, 14A, 194H disallowances deleted; rentals remanded, 80IA allowed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95280</link>
    <description>Transfer of passive infrastructure assets pursuant to a court-approved demerger was held to constitute a &quot;gift&quot; covered by section 47(iii) and therefore not a &quot;transfer&quot; under section 2(47), negating the Revenue&#039;s case for depreciation-related disallowance; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Network site rentals disallowed as excessive under section 40A(2)(b) were restored for de novo examination due to lack of factual inquiry into cost/value basis; remand ordered. Disallowance under section 14A was deleted as no exempt income was earned. Roaming charge disallowance under sections 40(a)(ia)/40(a)(i) for alleged TDS default was deleted, following binding precedent. Trade discounts on prepaid distribution were held outside section 194H; disa.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Passive infrastructure demerger transfer treated as gift; depreciation, TDS, 14A, 194H disallowances deleted; rentals remanded, 80IA allowed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95280</link>
      <description>Transfer of passive infrastructure assets pursuant to a court-approved demerger was held to constitute a &quot;gift&quot; covered by section 47(iii) and therefore not a &quot;transfer&quot; under section 2(47), negating the Revenue&#039;s case for depreciation-related disallowance; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Network site rentals disallowed as excessive under section 40A(2)(b) were restored for de novo examination due to lack of factual inquiry into cost/value basis; remand ordered. Disallowance under section 14A was deleted as no exempt income was earned. Roaming charge disallowance under sections 40(a)(ia)/40(a)(i) for alleged TDS default was deleted, following binding precedent. Trade discounts on prepaid distribution were held outside section 194H; disa.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>