<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1255 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783715</link>
    <description>Where an interlocutory application was sought to be withdrawn by filing a praecipe and making an oral prayer before the order was pronounced, the appellate tribunal held that the adjudicating authority ought not to have decided the application on merits. Accepting the counsel&#039;s affidavit as credible and noting that the reliefs originally sought were wide and general, the tribunal concluded that ends of justice required restoring the applicant&#039;s liberty to seek appropriate, properly framed relief. The impugned order dismissing the application on merits was set aside, and liberty was granted to file a fresh I.A. for reliefs/concessions to be considered afresh in accordance with law; the appeal was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1255 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783715</link>
      <description>Where an interlocutory application was sought to be withdrawn by filing a praecipe and making an oral prayer before the order was pronounced, the appellate tribunal held that the adjudicating authority ought not to have decided the application on merits. Accepting the counsel&#039;s affidavit as credible and noting that the reliefs originally sought were wide and general, the tribunal concluded that ends of justice required restoring the applicant&#039;s liberty to seek appropriate, properly framed relief. The impugned order dismissing the application on merits was set aside, and liberty was granted to file a fresh I.A. for reliefs/concessions to be considered afresh in accordance with law; the appeal was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>