<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1257 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783717</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be treated as condonable where, after excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy, the delay falls within the applicable grace period and no timely objection to limitation was raised. The Tribunal also treated the record as showing a bona fide misunderstanding arising from the Registry note and held that prejudice was not demonstrated. It further stated that a separate written application for condonation is not indispensable where relief can otherwise be granted under the law of limitation. On that basis, the recall request was rejected and the earlier order was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1257 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783717</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be treated as condonable where, after excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy, the delay falls within the applicable grace period and no timely objection to limitation was raised. The Tribunal also treated the record as showing a bona fide misunderstanding arising from the Registry note and held that prejudice was not demonstrated. It further stated that a separate written application for condonation is not indispensable where relief can otherwise be granted under the law of limitation. On that basis, the recall request was rejected and the earlier order was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>