<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1258 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783718</link>
    <description>Amendment of a Section 95 personal guarantor application was permitted because it was sought before final adjudication and only to place the asserted correct invocation and default dates on record for proper determination. The tribunal held that such amendment did not decide limitation or the validity of guarantee invocation, and the guarantor retained liberty to contest both points, including any time-bar objection, in the main proceedings. Applying the general amendment principle, the request was allowed since no irreparable prejudice or accrued defence was withdrawn. The question whether the amended date makes the proceeding time-barred was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1258 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783718</link>
      <description>Amendment of a Section 95 personal guarantor application was permitted because it was sought before final adjudication and only to place the asserted correct invocation and default dates on record for proper determination. The tribunal held that such amendment did not decide limitation or the validity of guarantee invocation, and the guarantor retained liberty to contest both points, including any time-bar objection, in the main proceedings. Applying the general amendment principle, the request was allowed since no irreparable prejudice or accrued defence was withdrawn. The question whether the amended date makes the proceeding time-barred was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>