<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1262 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783722</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for imported goods cannot be rejected unless the department first establishes a legally sustainable doubt with reliable evidence and follows the valuation rules. In the live Bill of Entry for LED TVs, physical examination matched the import documents, and a brand mark on one component did not justify treating the entire goods as branded; the alleged mismatch in origin papers was explained as a typographical error. For past imports of drywall screws, third-party proforma invoices and retrieved electronic material from other importers and periods were insufficient without contemporaneous comparison and statutory admissibility of electronic records. On that basis, the valuation re-determination, related confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1262 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783722</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for imported goods cannot be rejected unless the department first establishes a legally sustainable doubt with reliable evidence and follows the valuation rules. In the live Bill of Entry for LED TVs, physical examination matched the import documents, and a brand mark on one component did not justify treating the entire goods as branded; the alleged mismatch in origin papers was explained as a typographical error. For past imports of drywall screws, third-party proforma invoices and retrieved electronic material from other importers and periods were insufficient without contemporaneous comparison and statutory admissibility of electronic records. On that basis, the valuation re-determination, related confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>