<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783740</link>
    <description>Transfer of passive infrastructure assets under an HC-approved demerger without consideration was held to be a &quot;gift&quot; protected by s.47(iii), not a &quot;transfer&quot; under s.2(47); Revenue&#039;s challenge to depreciation disallowance failed and its ground was dismissed. Network site rental disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) was remanded for de novo examination of cost/benefit and comparability; issue restored to AO. Disallowance under s.14A/Rule 8D was deleted as no exempt income arose; corresponding MAT adjustment under s.115JB was directed to be recomputed without importing Rule 8D. Roaming charge disallowance under s.40(a)(i)/(ia) for alleged TDS default was deleted; trade discount to prepaid distributors was held outside s.194H and disallowance deleted. Multiple s.80IA claims (including SFIS, forex gain, sharing/IRU revenue, bad-debts writeback, other income; initial year and amended rate) were allowed; variable DoT license fee disallowance was directed to be recomputed on amortisation; WPC payment treated under HC precedent; interest under s.36(1)(iii) and TP brand royalty adjustment were deleted; prepaid revenue recognition was accepted subject to limited AO verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 12:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783740</link>
      <description>Transfer of passive infrastructure assets under an HC-approved demerger without consideration was held to be a &quot;gift&quot; protected by s.47(iii), not a &quot;transfer&quot; under s.2(47); Revenue&#039;s challenge to depreciation disallowance failed and its ground was dismissed. Network site rental disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) was remanded for de novo examination of cost/benefit and comparability; issue restored to AO. Disallowance under s.14A/Rule 8D was deleted as no exempt income arose; corresponding MAT adjustment under s.115JB was directed to be recomputed without importing Rule 8D. Roaming charge disallowance under s.40(a)(i)/(ia) for alleged TDS default was deleted; trade discount to prepaid distributors was held outside s.194H and disallowance deleted. Multiple s.80IA claims (including SFIS, forex gain, sharing/IRU revenue, bad-debts writeback, other income; initial year and amended rate) were allowed; variable DoT license fee disallowance was directed to be recomputed on amortisation; WPC payment treated under HC precedent; interest under s.36(1)(iii) and TP brand royalty adjustment were deleted; prepaid revenue recognition was accepted subject to limited AO verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>