<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 106 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48830</link>
    <description>Electric coil stoves were held not to be &quot;hot plates&quot; for classification under Notification No. 160/86-CE because fiscal entries must be construed according to the ordinary commercial understanding in trade, not dictionary meaning. The record showed that trade and consumers treated electric coil stoves and hot plates as different products, and the enclosed or sheathed heating element did not justify treating them as the same item. Since the goods were not specifically enumerated as hot plates, they fell within the residual category of &quot;other domestic electrical appliances&quot;, attracting nil rate of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 106 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48830</link>
      <description>Electric coil stoves were held not to be &quot;hot plates&quot; for classification under Notification No. 160/86-CE because fiscal entries must be construed according to the ordinary commercial understanding in trade, not dictionary meaning. The record showed that trade and consumers treated electric coil stoves and hot plates as different products, and the enclosed or sheathed heating element did not justify treating them as the same item. Since the goods were not specifically enumerated as hot plates, they fell within the residual category of &quot;other domestic electrical appliances&quot;, attracting nil rate of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>