https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465406 A stay of recovery was sought against orders dated 30.08.2019 and 16.10.2018, with Revenue relying on later-discovered scam-related allegations and stating that its officers had also been proceeded against. The petitioner denied that the matter involved any scam. The HC noted that the issue required detailed examination and declined to grant stay, finding that no case for interim stay was made out. en-us Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2025 22:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465406 A stay of recovery was sought against orders dated 30.08.2019 and 16.10.2018, with Revenue relying on later-discovered scam-related allegations and stating that its officers had also been proceeded against. The petitioner denied that the matter involved any scam. The HC noted that the issue required detailed examination and declined to grant stay, finding that no case for interim stay was made out. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465406