<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465416</link>
    <description>Following prior HC rulings, the Court held that interest on delayed realization of outstanding receivables does not constitute an &quot;international transaction&quot; amenable to TP adjustment; the TP addition on this count was unsustainable. On disallowance under s. 40(a)(ia) concerning secondees&#039; remuneration, it affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the secondees functioned as the taxpayer&#039;s employees, attracting TDS under s. 192 and excluding the application of s. 195; the disallowance was therefore deleted. On the addition for non-charging of mark-up on support service charges to a resident Indian affiliate, it held that absent statutory mandate and revenue loss, commercial terms between resident parties could not be rewritten; the addition was deleted. The Court admitted the appeal only on the question concerning year-end accruals/excess provisioning and lack of supporting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:25:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465416</link>
      <description>Following prior HC rulings, the Court held that interest on delayed realization of outstanding receivables does not constitute an &quot;international transaction&quot; amenable to TP adjustment; the TP addition on this count was unsustainable. On disallowance under s. 40(a)(ia) concerning secondees&#039; remuneration, it affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the secondees functioned as the taxpayer&#039;s employees, attracting TDS under s. 192 and excluding the application of s. 195; the disallowance was therefore deleted. On the addition for non-charging of mark-up on support service charges to a resident Indian affiliate, it held that absent statutory mandate and revenue loss, commercial terms between resident parties could not be rewritten; the addition was deleted. The Court admitted the appeal only on the question concerning year-end accruals/excess provisioning and lack of supporting evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>