<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 51 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48824</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid inputs received from outside suppliers and used in manufacture of final products, where both the inputs and final products were notified as eligible items. Provisions dealing with retention, re-entry, or refund of duty on goods returned to factory did not apply, because those rules concerned duty-paid goods manufactured by the claimant, not externally sourced inputs. The claim could not be rejected by treating supplier-returned or rejected components as returned goods under that scheme. Credit on the duty-paid inputs was therefore allowable, and the rejection of the claim was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 51 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48824</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid inputs received from outside suppliers and used in manufacture of final products, where both the inputs and final products were notified as eligible items. Provisions dealing with retention, re-entry, or refund of duty on goods returned to factory did not apply, because those rules concerned duty-paid goods manufactured by the claimant, not externally sourced inputs. The claim could not be rejected by treating supplier-returned or rejected components as returned goods under that scheme. Credit on the duty-paid inputs was therefore allowable, and the rejection of the claim was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>