https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783651 The SC reiterated that judicial review of arbitral awards must remain limited, and that Section 37 scrutiny cannot go beyond the narrow scope of Section 34. It held that reappreciation of evidence and substitution of a different factual view are impermissible, and that patent illegality must be a clear error going to the root of the award, not merely an alternate view of the facts. On extra-work claims, the tribunal's award of reasonable compensation was treated as restitutionary relief based on quantum meruit and Section 70 of the Contract Act, 1872, not as contractual rewriting. The award was restored and High Court interference was set aside. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2025 07:45:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783651 The SC reiterated that judicial review of arbitral awards must remain limited, and that Section 37 scrutiny cannot go beyond the narrow scope of Section 34. It held that reappreciation of evidence and substitution of a different factual view are impermissible, and that patent illegality must be a clear error going to the root of the award, not merely an alternate view of the facts. On extra-work claims, the tribunal's award of reasonable compensation was treated as restitutionary relief based on quantum meruit and Section 70 of the Contract Act, 1872, not as contractual rewriting. The award was restored and High Court interference was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783651