<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1216 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783676</link>
    <description>Computational errors in assessment were held rectifiable as apparent from record because deduction u/s 80-IA was fully denied despite an overlapping TP addition causing double disallowance, Chapter VI-A deduction and MAT credit were wrongly computed, and income was taken from intimation u/s 143(1) instead of the revised return; AO was directed to correct computations, recompute demand, and grant consequential refund. For TP on management support services, functionally dissimilar comparables (including a Government undertaking and a credit rating entity) were excluded, rendering the margin at arm&#039;s length; TP adjustment was deleted. Reimbursements of software costs received at cost were held not to require mark-up; adjustment was directed to be deleted. Captive power transfer ALP was held benchmarkable at SEB rate, not IEX; related adjustment was deleted. Disallowance u/s 14A without exempt income and corresponding MAT addition were held impermissible; deleted. Enhanced u/s 80-IA claim and trade-receivables adjustment were remitted for verification. Deduction u/s 35(2AB) could not be denied solely for non-issuance/delay of Form 3CL; AO directed to obtain it and allow as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1216 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783676</link>
      <description>Computational errors in assessment were held rectifiable as apparent from record because deduction u/s 80-IA was fully denied despite an overlapping TP addition causing double disallowance, Chapter VI-A deduction and MAT credit were wrongly computed, and income was taken from intimation u/s 143(1) instead of the revised return; AO was directed to correct computations, recompute demand, and grant consequential refund. For TP on management support services, functionally dissimilar comparables (including a Government undertaking and a credit rating entity) were excluded, rendering the margin at arm&#039;s length; TP adjustment was deleted. Reimbursements of software costs received at cost were held not to require mark-up; adjustment was directed to be deleted. Captive power transfer ALP was held benchmarkable at SEB rate, not IEX; related adjustment was deleted. Disallowance u/s 14A without exempt income and corresponding MAT addition were held impermissible; deleted. Enhanced u/s 80-IA claim and trade-receivables adjustment were remitted for verification. Deduction u/s 35(2AB) could not be denied solely for non-issuance/delay of Form 3CL; AO directed to obtain it and allow as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>