<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 949 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465387</link>
    <description>Deductibility of provision for mine-closure expenditure turned on whether liability had accrued. The ITAT held that once statutory approval from the Regional Controller of Mines is required, the liability is treated as having arisen upon satisfaction of that condition; mere uncertainty in quantification does not defer accrual, and the computation basis was not disputed. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance was affirmed and the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Deductibility of provision for executive pay revision depended on whether liability crystallised in the year of service. Following earlier years, the ITAT held that services rendered during the year created the liability though quantification took time, and allowed the claim. Accordingly, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 949 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465387</link>
      <description>Deductibility of provision for mine-closure expenditure turned on whether liability had accrued. The ITAT held that once statutory approval from the Regional Controller of Mines is required, the liability is treated as having arisen upon satisfaction of that condition; mere uncertainty in quantification does not defer accrual, and the computation basis was not disputed. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance was affirmed and the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Deductibility of provision for executive pay revision depended on whether liability crystallised in the year of service. Following earlier years, the ITAT held that services rendered during the year created the liability though quantification took time, and allowed the claim. Accordingly, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>