<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi HC asks Customs to respond to IndiGo’s plea seeking refund of Rs 900 cr duty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65240</link>
    <description>Petitioner challenges re levy of Customs duty on goods re imported after overseas repairs as a double levy where basic Customs duty was paid on re import and GST was discharged on the repair service; petitioner seeks refund of over Rs 900 crore paid on more than 4,000 bills, relying on a tribunal ruling that re levy is impermissible and that a later amendment to an exemption notification operates only prospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi HC asks Customs to respond to IndiGo’s plea seeking refund of Rs 900 cr duty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65240</link>
      <description>Petitioner challenges re levy of Customs duty on goods re imported after overseas repairs as a double levy where basic Customs duty was paid on re import and GST was discharged on the repair service; petitioner seeks refund of over Rs 900 crore paid on more than 4,000 bills, relying on a tribunal ruling that re levy is impermissible and that a later amendment to an exemption notification operates only prospectively.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>