<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 65 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to include the mark-up charges of Rs. 1,000/- per vehicle in the assessable value of motor vehicles sold under the rate contract between the appellant company and DGS &amp;amp; D. The mark-up charges were considered part of the contract price for after-sales services and warranty continuation, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that expenses contributing to an article&#039;s value should be included. Despite conflicting decisions in other cases, the Tribunal emphasized the contractual obligations for after-sales services, ultimately rejecting the appeal and affirming the inclusion of mark-up charges in the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:24:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 65 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to include the mark-up charges of Rs. 1,000/- per vehicle in the assessable value of motor vehicles sold under the rate contract between the appellant company and DGS &amp;amp; D. The mark-up charges were considered part of the contract price for after-sales services and warranty continuation, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation that expenses contributing to an article&#039;s value should be included. Despite conflicting decisions in other cases, the Tribunal emphasized the contractual obligations for after-sales services, ultimately rejecting the appeal and affirming the inclusion of mark-up charges in the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>