<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1605 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465384</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the appeal could be entertained despite delay in filing. The SC held that the delay was not condonable in the circumstances, and therefore declined to examine the matter on merits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed solely on the ground of delay, leaving the impugned decision undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1605 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465384</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the appeal could be entertained despite delay in filing. The SC held that the delay was not condonable in the circumstances, and therefore declined to examine the matter on merits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed solely on the ground of delay, leaving the impugned decision undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>