<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 61 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48794</link>
    <description>Excise valuation under section 4 turns on the normal wholesale price at which goods are ordinarily sold. Sales to a related person affect assessable value only if the relationship is shown to influence the price or depress the value; here, the bulk sales price was supported by cost, profit margin, comparable sales, imports of identical goods and export realizations. Small sales to re-conditioners were a distinct and negligible class and could not replace the principal wholesale price as the benchmark. No mutuality of interest, extra-commercial consideration or depressed valuation was established, so the duty demand, penalty, confiscation and connected penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 61 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48794</link>
      <description>Excise valuation under section 4 turns on the normal wholesale price at which goods are ordinarily sold. Sales to a related person affect assessable value only if the relationship is shown to influence the price or depress the value; here, the bulk sales price was supported by cost, profit margin, comparable sales, imports of identical goods and export realizations. Small sales to re-conditioners were a distinct and negligible class and could not replace the principal wholesale price as the benchmark. No mutuality of interest, extra-commercial consideration or depressed valuation was established, so the duty demand, penalty, confiscation and connected penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>