<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 60 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48793</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was confined to capital goods used within the factory premises or precincts. The CEGAT treated &quot;factory&quot; under Section 2(e) as the area where manufacture or a connected manufacturing process is carried on, not a separate site outside the factory boundary. A pump installed at a reservoir about one kilometre from the factory was outside the factory ground plan and was not separately registered under Rule 174. Because the reservoir site merely supplied water for manufacture and was not part of the factory, the pump did not qualify as capital goods used in the factory and credit was inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 60 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48793</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was confined to capital goods used within the factory premises or precincts. The CEGAT treated &quot;factory&quot; under Section 2(e) as the area where manufacture or a connected manufacturing process is carried on, not a separate site outside the factory boundary. A pump installed at a reservoir about one kilometre from the factory was outside the factory ground plan and was not separately registered under Rule 174. Because the reservoir site merely supplied water for manufacture and was not part of the factory, the pump did not qualify as capital goods used in the factory and credit was inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>