<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1147 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783607</link>
    <description>An allocation letter for a coal block can constitute property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 because the Act extends to intangible rights and interests; where the allocation was obtained by misrepresentation in relation to proved scheduled offences, it was treated as proceeds of crime. Share application money and share premium raised on the strength of the expected coal block allotment were also held to be traceable to the tainted allocation, so their later receipt, the absence of mining, and use for business purposes did not change their character. The attachment was therefore upheld as the funds and rights were derived directly or indirectly from criminal activity linked to the scheduled offences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1147 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783607</link>
      <description>An allocation letter for a coal block can constitute property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 because the Act extends to intangible rights and interests; where the allocation was obtained by misrepresentation in relation to proved scheduled offences, it was treated as proceeds of crime. Share application money and share premium raised on the strength of the expected coal block allotment were also held to be traceable to the tainted allocation, so their later receipt, the absence of mining, and use for business purposes did not change their character. The attachment was therefore upheld as the funds and rights were derived directly or indirectly from criminal activity linked to the scheduled offences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>