<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1178 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783638</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated beyond three years was tested against the statutory precondition in s.149(1)(b) that income escaping assessment must amount to, or be likely to amount to, at least Rs. 50 lakh. The ITAT held that &quot;likely to amount&quot; requires a reasonable belief founded on material and a preliminary analysis of the nature of entries, and cannot be inferred from gross bank credits alone. Here, the material showed the taxpayer earned only commission on trading receipts of Rs. 1.74 crore; even on an aggressive estimation basis, the taxable escaped income could not cross Rs. 50 lakh, and the ultimately assessed income was far below that threshold. The reopening was therefore time-barred and without jurisdiction; the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1178 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783638</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated beyond three years was tested against the statutory precondition in s.149(1)(b) that income escaping assessment must amount to, or be likely to amount to, at least Rs. 50 lakh. The ITAT held that &quot;likely to amount&quot; requires a reasonable belief founded on material and a preliminary analysis of the nature of entries, and cannot be inferred from gross bank credits alone. Here, the material showed the taxpayer earned only commission on trading receipts of Rs. 1.74 crore; even on an aggressive estimation basis, the taxable escaped income could not cross Rs. 50 lakh, and the ultimately assessed income was far below that threshold. The reopening was therefore time-barred and without jurisdiction; the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>