https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465358 Judicial review was sought against a disciplinary enquiry report/recommendation and a show-cause notice proposing compulsory retirement, relying inter alia on the petitioner's acquittal in a criminal case. The HC held that the impugned document was only a recommendation and that only a show-cause notice had been issued pursuant thereto; the petitioner had not yet filed a reply and no final order had been passed, rendering interference premature. The petitioner was permitted time to submit a reply, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to challenge any subsequent adverse final order and to raise all contentions then. en-us Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:30:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465358 Judicial review was sought against a disciplinary enquiry report/recommendation and a show-cause notice proposing compulsory retirement, relying inter alia on the petitioner's acquittal in a criminal case. The HC held that the impugned document was only a recommendation and that only a show-cause notice had been issued pursuant thereto; the petitioner had not yet filed a reply and no final order had been passed, rendering interference premature. The petitioner was permitted time to submit a reply, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to challenge any subsequent adverse final order and to raise all contentions then. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465358