<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1697 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465359</link>
    <description>Permission to file the special leave petition was granted, but the Court dismissed the petition on merits. The earlier direction requiring marking presence through video conferencing was modified, and the accused was directed to appear physically once a week before the Investigating Officer instead. The operative effect was substitution of the virtual attendance condition with a weekly physical appearance requirement while declining further relief in the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1697 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465359</link>
      <description>Permission to file the special leave petition was granted, but the Court dismissed the petition on merits. The earlier direction requiring marking presence through video conferencing was modified, and the accused was directed to appear physically once a week before the Investigating Officer instead. The operative effect was substitution of the virtual attendance condition with a weekly physical appearance requirement while declining further relief in the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>