https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48781 Questions on whether the limitation in Section 11A applies to proceedings under Rule 57-I were treated as fit for reference because an identical reference was already pending in another matter and that fact was not disputed. On that basis, the Tribunal directed that the questions be forwarded to the Supreme Court under Section 35H. The operative point is that the existence of a parallel reference supported making the present reference rather than deciding the limitation issue itself. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:15:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48781 Questions on whether the limitation in Section 11A applies to proceedings under Rule 57-I were treated as fit for reference because an identical reference was already pending in another matter and that fact was not disputed. On that basis, the Tribunal directed that the questions be forwarded to the Supreme Court under Section 35H. The operative point is that the existence of a parallel reference supported making the present reference rather than deciding the limitation issue itself. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48781