<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 118 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48765</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on the basis of the original invoice was unavailable unless the assessee satisfied the Assistant Commissioner that the duplicate invoice had been lost in transit. As no such assertion was made in reply to the show cause notice and no proof of loss was produced, the foundational condition under Rule 57G(2A) was not met. On that basis, credit on the original invoice could not be sustained and was correctly denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 118 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48765</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on the basis of the original invoice was unavailable unless the assessee satisfied the Assistant Commissioner that the duplicate invoice had been lost in transit. As no such assertion was made in reply to the show cause notice and no proof of loss was produced, the foundational condition under Rule 57G(2A) was not met. On that basis, credit on the original invoice could not be sustained and was correctly denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>