<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1092 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783552</link>
    <description>Whether the AO could sustain an addition under s. 50C on the basis of stamp duty value without adequate transaction documentation and without ascertaining fair market value was the dominant issue. The tribunal held that, as the AO proceeded on assumptions in the absence of requisite material and the assessee claimed that market value was lower than stamp valuation, the matter required a valuation reference and consideration of full sale/purchase documentation; further, there was no merits finding and the first appellate authority dismissed the appeal in limine. Consequently, the assessment on s. 50C was set aside and the matter was remitted to the AO with a direction to obtain a DVO report and decide afresh in accordance with law; the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1092 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783552</link>
      <description>Whether the AO could sustain an addition under s. 50C on the basis of stamp duty value without adequate transaction documentation and without ascertaining fair market value was the dominant issue. The tribunal held that, as the AO proceeded on assumptions in the absence of requisite material and the assessee claimed that market value was lower than stamp valuation, the matter required a valuation reference and consideration of full sale/purchase documentation; further, there was no merits finding and the first appellate authority dismissed the appeal in limine. Consequently, the assessment on s. 50C was set aside and the matter was remitted to the AO with a direction to obtain a DVO report and decide afresh in accordance with law; the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>