<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1093 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783553</link>
    <description>Rejection of registration under s. 12AB on the ground of non-compliance with notices and consequent inability of the authority to satisfy itself about charitable objects and genuineness of activities was examined for violation of natural justice. The Tribunal accepted affidavit-based explanation that the responsible office-bearer was posted at a remote location without internet access and therefore could not receive emailed notices, constituting bona fide reasonable cause for non-response. Holding that the applicant was effectively denied reasonable opportunity of hearing, the Tribunal set aside the rejection order and remanded the application to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration; the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1093 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783553</link>
      <description>Rejection of registration under s. 12AB on the ground of non-compliance with notices and consequent inability of the authority to satisfy itself about charitable objects and genuineness of activities was examined for violation of natural justice. The Tribunal accepted affidavit-based explanation that the responsible office-bearer was posted at a remote location without internet access and therefore could not receive emailed notices, constituting bona fide reasonable cause for non-response. Holding that the applicant was effectively denied reasonable opportunity of hearing, the Tribunal set aside the rejection order and remanded the application to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration; the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>