https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783592 Where the statutory appeal period had expired, the matter was nevertheless remitted for fresh consideration on equitable terms. The petitioner was required to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash and file a reply with supporting documents, treating the assessment order as an addendum to the show cause notice. On such compliance, the authority was to pass a fresh order on merits in accordance with law, and the bank attachment was to stand vacated automatically. In default, recovery could proceed as if the writ petition had been dismissed in limine. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:01:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783592 Where the statutory appeal period had expired, the matter was nevertheless remitted for fresh consideration on equitable terms. The petitioner was required to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash and file a reply with supporting documents, treating the assessment order as an addendum to the show cause notice. On such compliance, the authority was to pass a fresh order on merits in accordance with law, and the bank attachment was to stand vacated automatically. In default, recovery could proceed as if the writ petition had been dismissed in limine. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783592