<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783595</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether an accused alleged to have fraudulently availed ITC through goods-less invoices and fake firms should be granted bail. Applying SC guidance that bail should ordinarily be granted absent extraordinary circumstances, and that arrest under the GST regime must be founded on recorded &quot;reasons to believe&quot; based on material satisfying statutory conditions rather than suspicion or coercive tax recovery, the HC held that mere severity and alleged revenue loss cannot justify indefinite incarceration, particularly given the Article 21 right to speedy trial and no substantiated apprehension of tampering or interference. The bail petition was allowed and the accused was ordered to be released on bonds subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783595</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether an accused alleged to have fraudulently availed ITC through goods-less invoices and fake firms should be granted bail. Applying SC guidance that bail should ordinarily be granted absent extraordinary circumstances, and that arrest under the GST regime must be founded on recorded &quot;reasons to believe&quot; based on material satisfying statutory conditions rather than suspicion or coercive tax recovery, the HC held that mere severity and alleged revenue loss cannot justify indefinite incarceration, particularly given the Article 21 right to speedy trial and no substantiated apprehension of tampering or interference. The bail petition was allowed and the accused was ordered to be released on bonds subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>