https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783597 A dispute over GST applied to construction work contracts led the HC to require the 2nd respondent to examine the petitioner's representation for differential tax payment on its own merits. The Court noted the claim was said to depend on governmental and departmental instructions and directed reconsideration in light of the relevant Government orders after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction for fresh consideration within the stipulated time, and no substantive ruling was given on GST liability or entitlement to payment of the tax difference. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783597 A dispute over GST applied to construction work contracts led the HC to require the 2nd respondent to examine the petitioner's representation for differential tax payment on its own merits. The Court noted the claim was said to depend on governmental and departmental instructions and directed reconsideration in light of the relevant Government orders after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction for fresh consideration within the stipulated time, and no substantive ruling was given on GST liability or entitlement to payment of the tax difference. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783597