<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1247 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465341</link>
    <description>Where an assessee&#039;s registration under s 12A/12AA stands restored and remains operative, its income must be computed under ss 11-12; exemption depends on application of income to charitable objects, ordinarily to the extent of at least 85% of income. Since the lower authorities had not examined whether the surplus of income over expenditure was applied for the institution&#039;s objects, the Tribunal affirmed computation under ss 11-12 and rejected treating the surplus as taxable addition. On remuneration, the substantial rise in gross receipts with unchanged remuneration did not justify treating such payment as excessive when similar remuneration had been allowed in earlier years; the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and its appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 21:52:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1247 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465341</link>
      <description>Where an assessee&#039;s registration under s 12A/12AA stands restored and remains operative, its income must be computed under ss 11-12; exemption depends on application of income to charitable objects, ordinarily to the extent of at least 85% of income. Since the lower authorities had not examined whether the surplus of income over expenditure was applied for the institution&#039;s objects, the Tribunal affirmed computation under ss 11-12 and rejected treating the surplus as taxable addition. On remuneration, the substantial rise in gross receipts with unchanged remuneration did not justify treating such payment as excessive when similar remuneration had been allowed in earlier years; the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and its appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>