<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Show-cause notice uploaded under &quot;Additional Notices&quot; tab led to ex parte order; adjudication set aside, remanded for rehearing</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95135</link>
    <description>Ex parte adjudication was assailed on the ground that the show cause notice and order were uploaded only under an &quot;Additional Notices&quot; tab and were not effectively served, resulting in denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing and breach of natural justice. Applying the approach adopted in a comparable case, the adjudication was held to warrant interference because no reply had been filed due to lack of proper notice; consequently, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, subject to conditions due to the petitioner&#039;s belated approach, while the challenge to the impugned notifications remained pending. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:34:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Show-cause notice uploaded under &quot;Additional Notices&quot; tab led to ex parte order; adjudication set aside, remanded for rehearing</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95135</link>
      <description>Ex parte adjudication was assailed on the ground that the show cause notice and order were uploaded only under an &quot;Additional Notices&quot; tab and were not effectively served, resulting in denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing and breach of natural justice. Applying the approach adopted in a comparable case, the adjudication was held to warrant interference because no reply had been filed due to lack of proper notice; consequently, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, subject to conditions due to the petitioner&#039;s belated approach, while the challenge to the impugned notifications remained pending. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:34:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>