<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exempt-income expense disallowance u/s14A: whether AO can apply r.8D without recording satisfaction; addition deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95123</link>
    <description>Disallowance under s.14A r/w r.8D was examined where the taxpayer had made a suo motu disallowance against exempt income. Since r.8D is not automatic, the AO could invoke it only after examining the taxpayer&#039;s accounts and recording satisfaction under s.14A(2) that the taxpayer&#039;s claim was incorrect; a mere remark that the disallowance was &quot;very low&quot; did not meet this statutory requirement. Applying this mandatory satisfaction test, as reiterated in Maxopp, the r.8D-based incremental disallowance was held bad in law and deleted, restricting disallowance to the taxpayer&#039;s suo motu amount; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:12:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exempt-income expense disallowance u/s14A: whether AO can apply r.8D without recording satisfaction; addition deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95123</link>
      <description>Disallowance under s.14A r/w r.8D was examined where the taxpayer had made a suo motu disallowance against exempt income. Since r.8D is not automatic, the AO could invoke it only after examining the taxpayer&#039;s accounts and recording satisfaction under s.14A(2) that the taxpayer&#039;s claim was incorrect; a mere remark that the disallowance was &quot;very low&quot; did not meet this statutory requirement. Applying this mandatory satisfaction test, as reiterated in Maxopp, the r.8D-based incremental disallowance was held bad in law and deleted, restricting disallowance to the taxpayer&#039;s suo motu amount; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:12:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>