<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Counterfeit notes hidden in TV luggage and Section 108 customs statements: insufficient to prove knowledge; acquittal upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95118</link>
    <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act was construed as an inquiry power to elicit truth, treating the inquiry as a &quot;judicial proceeding&quot; only for limited purposes, and not as a mechanism to record a confession akin to one under Section 164 CrPC; therefore, reliance on such statements could not, by itself, establish guilt for organised crime, counterfeit currency offences, or conspiracy. On the evidence, alleged carriage of a television set and subsequent contact with an overseas number did not prove conscious knowledge of concealed counterfeit notes, especially given baggage clearance and screening circumstances, and the investigation&#039;s failure to lodge a prompt complaint weakened the prosecution case. Interference with the acquittal was declined and the appeal was dismissed. -HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Counterfeit notes hidden in TV luggage and Section 108 customs statements: insufficient to prove knowledge; acquittal upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95118</link>
      <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act was construed as an inquiry power to elicit truth, treating the inquiry as a &quot;judicial proceeding&quot; only for limited purposes, and not as a mechanism to record a confession akin to one under Section 164 CrPC; therefore, reliance on such statements could not, by itself, establish guilt for organised crime, counterfeit currency offences, or conspiracy. On the evidence, alleged carriage of a television set and subsequent contact with an overseas number did not prove conscious knowledge of concealed counterfeit notes, especially given baggage clearance and screening circumstances, and the investigation&#039;s failure to lodge a prompt complaint weakened the prosecution case. Interference with the acquittal was declined and the appeal was dismissed. -HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>