<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported multimedia speaker classification without USB/FM features upheld under CTH 85182200, rejecting claim for CTH 85279100</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95117</link>
    <description>Classification of imported multimedia speakers lacking additional functionalities (e.g., USB playback, FM radio) was determined by applying the binding departmental clarification in CBEC Circular No. 27/2013-Cus., which specifies that such speakers fall under CTH 8518. As the importer failed to produce evidence that the goods possessed any additional features warranting classification under CTH 85279100, the re-assessment under CTH 85182200 was held correct on the documentary record. Consequently, the re-classification orders were affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported multimedia speaker classification without USB/FM features upheld under CTH 85182200, rejecting claim for CTH 85279100</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95117</link>
      <description>Classification of imported multimedia speakers lacking additional functionalities (e.g., USB playback, FM radio) was determined by applying the binding departmental clarification in CBEC Circular No. 27/2013-Cus., which specifies that such speakers fall under CTH 8518. As the importer failed to produce evidence that the goods possessed any additional features warranting classification under CTH 85279100, the re-assessment under CTH 85182200 was held correct on the documentary record. Consequently, the re-classification orders were affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:04:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>