<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported inductors for telecom device PCBA: classified under 85045090 (other inductors); nil BCD exemption denied, duty payable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95114</link>
    <description>Imported inductors intended for use in manufacturing telecommunication equipment were held to have a specific tariff heading under Ch. 85; applying GRI 1 and Note 2(a) to Section XVI, they were classified as &quot;other inductors&quot; under CTI 85045090 (not choke coils), rendering classification as parts under any alternative heading unnecessary. The nil BCD exemption under Sl. No. 5 of N/N. 25/2005-Cus was denied because the entry covers &quot;other inductors for power supply&quot; of ADPM/telecommunication apparatus, whereas the goods were for PCBA within telecommunication devices, not for power supply units; applying strict interpretation of exemptions, benefit was refused and merit duty held payable. - AAR</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:48:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:48:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported inductors for telecom device PCBA: classified under 85045090 (other inductors); nil BCD exemption denied, duty payable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95114</link>
      <description>Imported inductors intended for use in manufacturing telecommunication equipment were held to have a specific tariff heading under Ch. 85; applying GRI 1 and Note 2(a) to Section XVI, they were classified as &quot;other inductors&quot; under CTI 85045090 (not choke coils), rendering classification as parts under any alternative heading unnecessary. The nil BCD exemption under Sl. No. 5 of N/N. 25/2005-Cus was denied because the entry covers &quot;other inductors for power supply&quot; of ADPM/telecommunication apparatus, whereas the goods were for PCBA within telecommunication devices, not for power supply units; applying strict interpretation of exemptions, benefit was refused and merit duty held payable. - AAR</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:48:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>