<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Electricity security deposit after auction purchase: buyer sought interest for past disconnection period, claim rejected on appeal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95108</link>
    <description>Interest on an electricity security deposit was claimed by a successful auction purchaser on the basis that prior electricity liabilities stood extinguished and that regulatory interest was payable. The NCLAT held that the liquidation-related concessions merely directed restoration of supply and continuation of the security deposit in the corporate debtor&#039;s name, and did not create any entitlement to interest. Further, the interest-adjustment mechanism under the applicable electricity regulations operated through annual billing, but supply had been permanently disconnected years earlier and the deposit was withheld against dues resolved through separate HC-directed payments; the auction purchaser, entering in 2021, could not assert interest from the 2016-17 disconnection period. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:28:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Electricity security deposit after auction purchase: buyer sought interest for past disconnection period, claim rejected on appeal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95108</link>
      <description>Interest on an electricity security deposit was claimed by a successful auction purchaser on the basis that prior electricity liabilities stood extinguished and that regulatory interest was payable. The NCLAT held that the liquidation-related concessions merely directed restoration of supply and continuation of the security deposit in the corporate debtor&#039;s name, and did not create any entitlement to interest. Further, the interest-adjustment mechanism under the applicable electricity regulations operated through annual billing, but supply had been permanently disconnected years earlier and the deposit was withheld against dues resolved through separate HC-directed payments; the auction purchaser, entering in 2021, could not assert interest from the 2016-17 disconnection period. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:28:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>