<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1036 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783496</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of business profit at 8% where the assessee had not maintained books and had himself adopted 8% presumptive profit in subsequent years. The Tribunal held that there was no basis to accept the assessee&#039;s plea for 6% profit and upheld the 8% rate. On disallowance under s.57, ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s contention that receipts from Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd. were business income, not income from other sources, and directed that only 8% profit thereon be taxed, deleting the balance 92%. Disallowance relating to LIC receipts was sustained. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1036 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783496</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of business profit at 8% where the assessee had not maintained books and had himself adopted 8% presumptive profit in subsequent years. The Tribunal held that there was no basis to accept the assessee&#039;s plea for 6% profit and upheld the 8% rate. On disallowance under s.57, ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s contention that receipts from Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd. were business income, not income from other sources, and directed that only 8% profit thereon be taxed, deleting the balance 92%. Disallowance relating to LIC receipts was sustained. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>