https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48706 A Larger Bench may defer hearing where a connected Supreme Court appeal is likely to determine the same classification issue and avoid inconsistent outcomes. The majority treated adjournment sine die as expedient because the controversy was limited in time, the same legal question was already pending before the Supreme Court, and the impending ruling was expected to govern the reference. The dissent considered indefinite adjournment inconsistent with the purpose of constituting a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting views and preferred an immediate answer. The proceeding was therefore kept in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision. en-us Mon, 04 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2023 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48706 A Larger Bench may defer hearing where a connected Supreme Court appeal is likely to determine the same classification issue and avoid inconsistent outcomes. The majority treated adjournment sine die as expedient because the controversy was limited in time, the same legal question was already pending before the Supreme Court, and the impending ruling was expected to govern the reference. The dissent considered indefinite adjournment inconsistent with the purpose of constituting a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting views and preferred an immediate answer. The proceeding was therefore kept in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48706