<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 997 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783457</link>
    <description>The Court considered whether the Tribunal&#039;s order disclosed any error of fact or law justifying appellate interference. After examining the Expert Appraiser&#039;s report, the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original, it found no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning and rejected the contention that the findings were contrary to law or fact. The Tribunal was held to have committed no error in fact or law, and the appeal was liable to be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 997 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783457</link>
      <description>The Court considered whether the Tribunal&#039;s order disclosed any error of fact or law justifying appellate interference. After examining the Expert Appraiser&#039;s report, the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original, it found no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning and rejected the contention that the findings were contrary to law or fact. The Tribunal was held to have committed no error in fact or law, and the appeal was liable to be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>