https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783455 The CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the customs broker's appeal and upheld revocation of licence, forfeiture of security deposit and penalty of Rs. 50,000/-. It found that the broker had effectively sub-let its licence for monetary consideration, filed benami shipping bills for export of prohibited goods (onions) mis-declared as other items, and violated Regulations 1(4), 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of CBLR by acting without authorization, failing to advise or verify the exporter, and not ensuring client identity. While the alleged breach of Regulation 10(e) was set aside, it did not affect the overall proportionality of the sanctions. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783455 The CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the customs broker's appeal and upheld revocation of licence, forfeiture of security deposit and penalty of Rs. 50,000/-. It found that the broker had effectively sub-let its licence for monetary consideration, filed benami shipping bills for export of prohibited goods (onions) mis-declared as other items, and violated Regulations 1(4), 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of CBLR by acting without authorization, failing to advise or verify the exporter, and not ensuring client identity. While the alleged breach of Regulation 10(e) was set aside, it did not affect the overall proportionality of the sanctions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783455