<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 946 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783406</link>
    <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Court must only see whether the prosecution material discloses sufficient ground to proceed and a prima facie case; it cannot weigh the defence or conduct a mini trial, and revisional interference is limited to patent illegality or jurisdictional error. Applying that standard, the Court found no legal infirmity in the orders refusing discharge and framing charge. The investigation material was held to disclose proceeds of crime, linked to illegal stone mining, unaccounted cash, suspicious bank deposits, and routing of illicit funds, so a prima facie case of money-laundering was made out and the proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 946 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783406</link>
      <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Court must only see whether the prosecution material discloses sufficient ground to proceed and a prima facie case; it cannot weigh the defence or conduct a mini trial, and revisional interference is limited to patent illegality or jurisdictional error. Applying that standard, the Court found no legal infirmity in the orders refusing discharge and framing charge. The investigation material was held to disclose proceeds of crime, linked to illegal stone mining, unaccounted cash, suspicious bank deposits, and routing of illicit funds, so a prima facie case of money-laundering was made out and the proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>