<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 968 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783428</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made u/s 69C on alleged bogus purchases/accommodation entries. The Tribunal held that the AO relied solely on generic Investigation Wing information and uncorroborated third-party materials (loose sheets, unsigned digital data) without producing primary evidence of any actual transaction involving the assessee, nor permitting cross-examination of third parties. The assessee had produced bank statements, GST returns, purchase/sales registers, ledgers and reconciliations, which were not disproved by the AO. Additions based on conjectures and presumptions were found unsustainable in law, and the reassessment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 968 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783428</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made u/s 69C on alleged bogus purchases/accommodation entries. The Tribunal held that the AO relied solely on generic Investigation Wing information and uncorroborated third-party materials (loose sheets, unsigned digital data) without producing primary evidence of any actual transaction involving the assessee, nor permitting cross-examination of third parties. The assessee had produced bank statements, GST returns, purchase/sales registers, ledgers and reconciliations, which were not disproved by the AO. Additions based on conjectures and presumptions were found unsustainable in law, and the reassessment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>